Frequently Asked QuestionsQuestion: How is the course curriculum for M.E./M.Tech at JNTUH College of Engineering?
{Source: M.E./M.Tech students & alumni}
Course Curriculum
* The course curriculum is a bit troublesome, with less time for practical technical skill building, making students less prepared for the industry. (Source: Review 14)
* However, the revised curriculum for junior batches is well-designed, providing ample time to build industry-relevant skills. (Source: Review 32)
* The course curriculum is relevant, making students industry-ready. (Source: Reviews 21, 36, 49)
* Some subjects in the course need to be updated to make students more practical than theoretical. (Source: Review 54)
* The faculty suggests that students rely on external resources, such as YouTube, to supplement their learning. (Source: Review 46)
Practical Knowledge
* The course focuses on theoretical knowledge, leaving students without practical exposure. (Source: Review 2
* The lack of application knowledge and site visits makes students feel unprepared for the industry. (Source: Review 3
Industry Relevance
* The course curriculum is designed to meet industry standards, providing students with relevant skills. (Source: Review 42)
* Students are encouraged to participate in industrial projects and training programs to gain hands-on experience. (Not mentioned in reviews)
Improvements Needed
* The course curriculum should be modified to include more practical knowledge and site visits. (Sources: Reviews 11, 23, 51)
* Elective subjects should be introduced to allow students to explore topics of interest. (Source: Review 55)
Overall, while the course curriculum has its limitations, it seems to be generally relevant and prepares students for the industry. However, improvements can be made to increase the focus on practical knowledge and industry relevance.
Course Curriculum
* The course curriculum is a bit troublesome, with less time for practical technical skill building, making students less prepared for the industry. (Source: Review 14)
* However, the revised curriculum for junior batches is well-designed, providing ample time to build industry-relevant skills. (Source: Review 32)
* The course curriculum is relevant, making students industry-ready. (Source: Reviews 21, 36, 49)
* Some subjects in the course need to be updated to make students more practical than theoretical. (Source: Review 54)
* The faculty suggests that students rely on external resources, such as YouTube, to supplement their learning. (Source: Review 46)
Practical Knowledge
* The course focuses on theoretical knowledge, leaving students without practical exposure. (Source: Review 2
* The lack of application knowledge and site visits makes students feel unprepared for the industry. (Source: Review 3
Industry Relevance
* The course curriculum is designed to meet industry standards, providing students with relevant skills. (Source: Review 42)
* Students are encouraged to participate in industrial projects and training programs to gain hands-on experience. (Not mentioned in reviews)
Improvements Needed
* The course curriculum should be modified to include more practical knowledge and site visits. (Sources: Reviews 11, 23, 51)
* Elective subjects should be introduced to allow students to explore topics of interest. (Source: Review 55)
Overall, while the course curriculum has its limitations, it seems to be generally relevant and prepares students for the industry. However, improvements can be made to increase the focus on practical knowledge and industry relevance.
